Nucleus 11/2001 edition
US president gives substantial boost for nuclear
New thinking about nuclear energy in the US may be an important turning
point for the future of nuclear power plants – both in the US
as well as elsewhere in the world.
US president George Bush has confirmed that the US
aims to expand the use of nuclear power. When unveiling the findings
of the National Energy Policy Development Group (NEPD) he said: “By
expanding existing nuclear facilities, we can generate more electricity
without pumping a gram of greenhouse gas into the atmosphere.”
However, Bush stressed that energy production and environmental protection
are not competing priorities and that his administration was determined
to find a safe and permanent repository for nuclear waste. The energy
policy document says: “Nuclear power plants serve millions of
US homes and businesses, have a dependable record for safety and efficiency,
and discharge no greenhouse gases into the atmosphere.” “These
facilities currently generate 20% of all electricity in the US and more
than 40% of electricity generated in 10 states in the north east, south
and midwest.” Bush said the proposed new energy policy would provide
for the safe expansion of nuclear energy by establishing a national
repository and by streamlining the licensing of nuclear power plants.
He added: “New reactor designs are safer and more economical that
the ones we have today.” There are several explicit recommendations
of NEPD group in the energy policy document regarding nuclear energy:
The NEPD group recommends the following specific components: To encourage
the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) ensures that safety and environmental
protection are high priorities as they prepare to evaluate and expedite
applications for licensing new advanced technology nuclear reactors.
To encourage the NRC to facilitate efforts by utilities to expand nuclear
energy generation in US by uprating existing nuclear plants safely.
To encourage the NRC to relicense existing nuclear plants that meet
or exceed recognized safety standards. To direct the Secretary of Energy
and the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to assess
the potential of nuclear energy to improve air quality. To increase
resources as necessary for nuclear safety enforcement in light of the
potential increase in generation. To use the best science to provide
a deep geologic repository for nuclear waste. To support legislation
clarifying that qualified funds set aside by plant owners for eventual
decommissioning will not be taxed as part of the transaction. To support
legislation aimed at extending the Price- Anderson Act. “The NEPD
Group also recommends that in the context of developing advanced nuclear
fuel cycles and next generation technologies for nuclear energy, the
US should re-examine its policies on research, development and deployment
of fuel conditioning methods (such as pyroprocessing) that reduce waste
streams and enhance proliferation resistance. “In doing so, the
US will continue to discourage the accumulation of separated plutonium,
worldwide. “The US should also consider technologies – in
collaboration with international partners with highly developed fuel
cycles and a record of close cooperation – to develop reprocessing
and fuel treatment technologies that are cleaner, more efficient, less
waste-intensive, and especially more proliferationresistant.”
Other recommendations in the policy include: Enacting “multi-pollutant
legislation to establish a flexible, market-based program to reduce
and cap emissions of sulphur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, and mercury from
electric power generators”. Increasing exports of “environmentally
friendly, market-ready US technologies that generate a clean environment
and increase energy efficiency”. Establishing a new “Royalties
Conservation Fund” and earmark royalties from “new, clean
oil and gas exploration to fund and conservation efforts”.
IAEA resolution on protection of nuclear materials
and facilities
The IAEA general conference held in Vienna on September
21st, 2001, adopted a resolution emphasizing the importance of physical
protection of nuclear material in preventing its illicit use, as well
as the sabotage of nuclear facilities and nuclear materials. “The
tragic terrorist attacks on the United States were a wake up call to
us all,” said Mohamed ElBaradei, IAEA director general. “We
cannot be complacent, ElBaradei said. “We have to and will increase
our efforts on all fronts – from combating illicit trafficking
to ensuring the protection of nuclear materials – from nuclear
installation design to withstanding attacks, to improving how we respond
to nuclear emergencies.” Member states at the conference called
on the agency to embark on a thorough review of its programs to see
what we can do to enhance security of nuclear material and facilities.
ElBaradei said the agency will be looking at ways to increase its information,
advisory and training functions to help member states to ensure that
nuclear regulatory infrastructure is in place; nuclear material, other
radioactive materials and facilities are properly protected against
theft and sabotage; the detection measures and equipment at borders
and elsewhere are effective in combating illicit trafficking; plans
are in place to respond effectively to such events; and issues regarding
nuclear installation safety are addressed. The IAEA has found that while
the level of security at nuclear facilities is generally very high,
security of medical and industrial radiation sources is “disturbingly
weak” in some countries. It estimates that, in the short term,
at least USD 30-50 million will be needed annually in order to strengthen
and expand its programs so that they are capable of meeting the “terrorist
threat”. The IAEA has the only international response system in
place that would be in a position to immediately assist countries in
case of a radiological emergency caused by a nuclear terrorist attack.
Quality management checks ordered
at German nuclear power plants
German environment minister Jürgen Trittin has ordered a review
of quality management procedures at all of the country’s nuclear
power plants in the wake of an incident at the Philippsburg nuclear
power plant in October. The order was announced as the incident, at
the second unit of the Philippsburg plant last August, was given a final
level-2 rating on the International Nuclear Event Scale (INES). The
incident had been provisionally rated as “below scale” but
was upgraded due to degradation of defense in depth. Trittin, said that
his decision to call for state-bystate checks to be carried out by nuclear
safety authorities followed a “further grave incident” discovered
at unit 2 on October 22nd, 2001during the INES inquiry process. The
INES report, published by the IAEA, said that it was also discovered
that the unit had been restarted with insufficient fluid levels in all
borated water storage tanks. Nucleus is an ENS briefing sheet mailed
to all members of the European Parliament’s Energy Committee,
the EU Commission, Economic & Social Committee, and Joint Research
Centre. Nationally, it is distributed to opinion leaders in most West
and East European countries. It is published by ENS in English and translated
ino Bulgarian, Croatian, Czech, Dutch, Hungarian, Polish, Romanian,
Russian, Serbian, Slovak, Slovenian and Ukrainian. For details, see
http://www.euronuclear.org/publications/nucleus/index.html Editor: Simon
Whild Production: Anthony Hunter November 2001 Published 6 times per
year
Four-year contract awarded to French radwaste
agency
The French radwaste management agency, Andra, has
signed a first-of-a-kind fouryear contract with the French government
defining a global approach to waste management. The agreement formalizes
Andra’s responsibility for the long-term management of all French
radioactive waste. The agreement calls for the creation of a central
low-level waste storage site by the end of 2003, the completion by 2004
of a reference inventory of all radwaste and associated materials, realization
of underground research laboratories as part of ongoing research into
the feasibility of permanent geological disposal of high-level waste
and a conceptual study into the storage or disposal of radium or graphite-bearing
wastes.