Nucleus 6/1999 edition
|
You can also download
the issue in PDF format [14 kB] |
Nucleus 6/1999 features the following stories:
|
Japan responding to fuel plant accident
Japanese safety officials and police are continuing
their investigations into the accident which exposed 70 workers to radiation
at Tokai Mura uranium conversion test facility.
Three of the workers were seriously injured in the September 30 “flash
criticality” – reportedly caused by company and workers
breaching safety regulations.
For safety exchanges, Japan is to set up a “national version”
of the World Association of Nuclear Operators, but in Japan covering
the fuel cycle as well as nuclear power plants.
The problems raised by the accident are a “separate issue”
to Japan’s overall nuclear energy policy, says new international
trade & industry minister Takashi Fukaya. He points out that the
accident was at a fuel facility, not at a nuclear reactor – and
that the two should not be confused.
Japan has 52 reactors producing around 35% of its electricity. Another
five power reactors are under construction or firmly planned.
Nuclear is “essential” to resource-short Japan, adds the
new head of the country’s Science & Technology Agency, Hirofumi
Nakasone.
More nuclear power "inevitable"
says World Energy Council
“No matter how special interest groups try to
cut it , new nuclear power is a key part of the world’s energy
wardrobe now and in the years to come,” says World Energy Council
(WEC) secretary general Gerald Doucet.
“I see the future of nuclear power as first and foremost a business
that has to prove itself in the marketplace. I welcome the evidence
of the nuclear industry’s recent success in this regard, that
it has become more transparent, less arrogant about public concerns
and, above all, ready to address customer choice in a liberalised market.
“These are key reasons why I believe new nuclear power generation
is inevitable, not just in countries such as Korea and Japan, but also
in Europe and the US. It is my firm hope that the nuclear industry will
join WEC in making nuclear power part of the solution to the commercial
energy needs of Africa, Latin America, Asia and parts of central and
eastern Europe.”
The WEC chief was addressing The Uranium Institute annual symposium
in London.
Ethics group calls for open approach to nuclear
energy
A Belgian working group of scientists, theologians,
philosophers and general public is calling for a balan-ced and objective
approach to nuclear energy.
The ethics group – set up by the Bishop of Bruges to develop the
position of the Belgian Catholic Church – concludes that nuclear
stands up very well in comparison to other energy sources. Nuclear is
one of the world’s “potentials”, with humankind being
responsible for using it ethically and safely.
The problems facing nuclear energy are mainly political and psychological,
says the working group.
It questions whether opposition to nuclear energy is morally justified
for future generations, and whether it is right to “squander”
and burn finite materials, such as coal, gas and oil, that could be
used in future for many purposes other than to generate electricity.
For details of the working group’s analysis, fax Chris Dierick
in Brussels on +32 2 505 0790.
Forced closure of German N-plants "would
breach constitution"
Any government move to close German nuclear power stations
without consent of their owners – or full financial compensation
– would violate the federal constitution (the Basic Law).
That’s the verdict of constitutional expert Udo di Fabio (Munich),
speaking as a government working group prepares to publish its view
of key legal issues in the Red-Green governing coalition’s plan
to quit nuclear. During a discussion organised in Berlin by the German
Atomic Forum, Prof. di Fabio stressed that Basic Law article 14 protects
rights of ownership.
Thus, a phase-out order “should be considered in legal terms as
appropriation of property, because it amounts to a deliberate change
to a legal position which was until now based on property rights.”
The nuclear issue has replaced ideology conflicts,
says German Social Democrat Rolf Linkohr, chair of the European parliament’s
energy committee. He adds: “Instead of discussing a new era in
the energy sector, and a policy for real reductions in energy consumption
by increasing energy efficiency, we are still mesmerised by our conflicts
about nuclear energy ... which have replaced former ideological conflicts.”
The German public is wary of phase-out, show new opinion
polls: 38% think quitting nuclear energy would be “unreasonable”,
29% are undecided and 23% in favour.
Sweden again postponing closure of Barsebäck-1?
November 30 is the day set by the Swedish government for the country’s
first closure of a nuclear power unit: Barsebäck-1, near the southern
city of Malmö.
But closure may have to be delayed because:
-
the unit’s electricity will be needed through the winter
to help offset lower hydropower after a dry summer and autumn;
-
the European Commission is studying claims by owners Sydkraft
that the government’s political closure order breaks competition
law;
-
Stockholm city court is considering Sydkraft’s appeal that
Barsebäck-1 should continue to operate until the European Commission
gives its ruling.
Meanwhile, Barsebäck has signed a major fuel deal. Says its president,
Per Lindell: “We have assumed that Barsebäck may continue
to operate after November 30. We plan according to the principle of
business as usual. If operation has to be stopped on November 30, we
would use a force majeure clause in the (fuel enrichment) contract.”
Parallel to all these moves, the government has reopened negotiations
with Sydkraft about compensation for closure.
Operators of old Russian reactors now train
on new Finn simulators
Russia’s Kola nuclear power station now has for
the first time a sophisticated simulator to train operators at the two
oldest of its VVER-440 reactors.
The station – 200 km from Murmansk – has just started using
the simulator gifted by neighbouring Finland.
Kola’s plant analyser and the training simulator are based on
the multifunctional process simulation software APRS, developed in Finland
by Fortum Engineering Ltd and the Technical Research Centre of Finland.
The simulator will be upgraded in step with the ongoing modernisation
of Kola nuclear power station.
East to close some reactors as price for
admission to EU
Lithuania and Slovakia have announced moves towards
closing power reactors as part of their negotiations to join the European
Union.
The Lithuanian parliament is backing a government recommendation to
close Ignalina-1 by year 2005 if Western countries help to finance its
decommissioning. Decommissioning would cost about USD 2.5 billion, says
energy minister Eugenijus Maldeikis.
The EU is planning an international donors conference before yearend
in the Lithuanian capital, Vilnius.
Meanwhile, the Slovak government has announced that it is to close Bohunice-1
and -2 early – in years 2006 and 2008, with EU financial aid for
decommissioning. The EU pressure for early closure is “political,
not expert”, comments deputy prime minister Pavol Hamzik.
The two 20-year-old Soviet-design reactors had recently been modernised:
“extraordinarily successfully”, according to an International
Atomic Energy Agency safety conference this year.
The EU is also pressing Bulgaria to shut old reactors.
Bulgaria’s nuclear station wins Green
acclaim
Bulgaria’s Kozloduy nuclear power station –
a prime target for anti-nuclear activists internationally – has
received an award for being environmentally friendly from the country’s
Green Party.
Presentation of the Party’s newly launched ecology award recognises
the 25-year-old power station’s safety improvements and its role
in curbing carbon dioxide emissions which would otherwise come from
fossil-fuelled power plants.
Kozloduy has six Soviet-design reactors, producing about 40% of the
nation’s electricity.
Units 5 and 6 are going through a six-year modernisation, including
installation of Western monitoring and computer systems. Units 1 to
4 have been upgraded, but will eventually close.